Lexical Definition

‎εἴ πως‎ eí pōs (i poce) if somehow ^G:COND
from ‎εἰ‎ and ‎-πώς‎

if by any means.

• if somehow

Abbott-Smith

εἰ, conjunctive particle, used in conditions and in indirect questions.

I. Conditional, if;
1. c. indic., expressing a general assumption;
(a) pres.: seq. indic, pres., Mt 11:14, Ro 8:25, al.; seq. imperat., Mk 4:23 9:22, Jo 15:18, I Co 7:9, al.; seq. fut. indic., Lk 16:31, Ro 8:11, al.; seq. pf. or aor., with negation in apodosis, Mt 12:26, Ro 4:14, al.; similarly, seq. impf., Lk 17:6, Jo 8:39; seq. quæst., Mt 6:23, Jo 5:47 7:23 8:46, I Pe 2:20;
(b) fut.: Mt 26:33, I Pe 2:20;
(c) pf.: Jo 11:12, Ro 6:5, al.;
(d) aor.: Lk 16:11 19:8, Jo 13:32, 18:23, Re 20:15, al.
2. Where the assumption is certain = ἐπεί: Mt 12:28, Jo 7:4, Ro 5:17, al.
3. Of an unfulfilled condition, c. indic, impf., aor. or plpf., seq. ἄν, c. imp. or aor. (v.s. ἄν, I, i).
4. C. indic., after verbs denoting wonder, etc., sometimes, but not always, coupled with an element of doubt: Mk 15:44, I Jo 3:13, al.
5. C. indic., as in LXX (Nu 14:3o, I Ki 14:45, al. = Heb. אִם), in oaths, with the formula of imprecation understood in a suppressed apodosis (WM, 627; Burton, §272): Mk 8:12, He 3:11 (LXX) 4:3 (LXX).
6. Rarely (cl.) c. optat., to express a merely possible condition: Ac 24:19 27:39, I Co 14:10 15:37, I Pe3:14, 17.
II. Interrogative, if, whether.
1. As in cl., in indir. questions after verbs of seeing, asking, knowing, saying, etc.: c. indic. pres., Mt 26:63, Mk 15:36, Ac 19:2, II Co 13:5, al.; fut., Mk 3:2, Ac 8:22, al.; aor., Mk 15:44, I Co 1:16, al.; c. subjc. aor. (M, Pr., 194), Phl 3:12.
2. As in LXX (= Heb. אִם and interrog. הֲ, Ge 17:17, al.; v. WM, 639 f.; Viteau, i, 22), in direct questions: Mk 8:23 (Tr., WH, txt.), Lk 13:23, 22:49, Ac 19:2, al.
III. With other particles.
1. εἰ ἄρα, εἴγε, εἰ δὲ μήγε, v.s. ἄρα, γε.
2. εἰ δὲ καί, but if also: Lk 11:18; but even if, I Co 4:7, II Co 4:3 11:16.
3. εἰ δὲ μή, but if not, but if otherwise: Mk 2:21, 22, Jo 14:2, Re 2:5, al.
4. εἰ καί, if even, if also, although: Mk 14:29, Lk 11:8, I Co 7:21, II Co 4:16, Phl 2:17, al.
5. καὶ εἰ, even if, v.s. καί
6. εἰ μή, if not, unless, except, but only: Mt 24:22, Mk 2:26 6:5, Jo 9:33, I Co 7:17 (only), Ga 1:19 (cf. ἐὰν μή, 2:16; v. Hort., Ja., xvi); ἐκτὸς εἰ μή, pleonastic (Bl., §65, 6), I Co 14:5 15:2, I Ti 5:19.
7. εἰ μήν = cl. ἦ μήν (M, Pr., 46), in oaths, surely (Ez 33:27, al.): He 6:14.
8. εἴ πως, if haply: Ac 27:12, Ro 1:10.
9. εἴτε . . . εἴτε, whether . . . or: Ro 12:6-8, I Co 3:22 13:8, al.

Abbott-Smith References

Liddell-Scott-Jones

combination of: εἰ (εἰ+-πώς)

Included with: εἴπως,

Attic dialect-Ionic dialect and [εἴπωςκ, see below 11 ad [near the start]), = \_Doric dialect\_ and \_Aeolic dialect\_ αἰ, αἰκ (which see), 5th c.AD: Cypria ">Refs 4th c.AD+] ἤ [εἴπως and αἰ">Refs] in Epic dialect:— Particle used interjectionally with imperative and to express a wish, but usually either in conditions, if, or in indirect questions, whether. In the former use its regular negative is μ; in the latter, οὐ.

__A INTERJECTIONALLY, in [Refs 8th c.BC+], come now! with imperative, εἴπως δὲ.. ἄκουσον [εἴπως δὲ καὶ αὐτοὶ φευγόντων [prev. work] 46; most frequently with ἄγε (which see), 1.302, +others ">Refs 8th c.BC+]
__A.2 in wishes, with optative, ἀλλ᾽ εἴ τις.. καλέσειεν [Refs]; so later, εἴ μοι ξυνείη μοῖρα [εἴπως γὰρ γενοίμην ἀντὶ σοῦ νεκρός 5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus “Hippolytus” 1410; εἴπως γὰρ γένοιτο 5th-6th c.BC: Xenophon Historicus “Institutio Cyri (Cyropaedia)” 6.1.38; εἴπως γὰρ ἐν τούτῳ εἴη 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Protagoras” 310d ">Refs 8th c.BC+]; of unattained wishes, in [εἴπως γὰρ ἐγὼν.. Διὸς πάϊς αἰγιόχοιο εἴην 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 13.825; Ζεῦ πάτερ, αἰ γὰρ ἐμὸς πόσις εἴη 7th c.BC: Alcman Lyricus 29 ">Refs 8th c.BC+]; later with past tenses of indicative, εἴπως γάρ μ᾽ ὑπὸ γῆν.. ἧκεν [Refs 4th c.BC+]; εἴπως γὰρ τοσαύτην δύναμιν εἶχον ὥστε.. [Refs 8th c.BC+]infinitive (compare the use of infinitive in commands), αἰ γὰρ τοῖος ἐὼν.. ἐμὸς γαμβρὸς καλέεσθαι [Refs]
__A.2.b εἴθε, Epic dialect αἴθε, is frequently used in wishes in the above constructions, εἴθε οἱ αὐτῷ Ζεὺς ἀγαθὸν τελέσειεν [Refs 8th c.BC+]: later with infinitive, γαίης χθαμαλωτέρη εἴθε.. κεῖσθαι [Refs 1st c.BC+]
__A.2.c εἴπως γάρ, εἴθε are also used with ὤφελον (Epic dialect ὤφελλον), of past unattained wishes, αἴθ᾽ ὤφελλες στρατοῦ ἄλλου σημαίνειν [Refs 8th c.BC+]; εἴπως γὰρ ὤφελον [κατιδεῖν] [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__A.2.d followed by a clause expressing a consequence of the fulfilment of the wish, αἰ γὰρ τοῦτο.. ἔπος τετελεσμένον εἴη· τῷ κε τάχα γνοίης.. [Refs 8th c.BC+]; sometimes hard to distinguish from εἴπως in conditions (which may be derived from this use), εἴ μοί τι πίθοιο, τό κεν πολὺ κέρδιον εἴη [Refs 8th c.BC+]
__B IN CONDITIONS, if:
__B.I with INDIC.,
__B.I.1 with all tenses (for future, see below [εἴπως δ᾽ οὕτω τοῦτ᾽ ἐστίν, ἐμοὶ μέλλει φίλον εἶναι but ">Refs]if this is so, it will be.., [Refs 8th c.BC+]: any form of the Verb may stand in apodosi, εἴπως θεοί τι δρῶσιν αἰσχρόν, οὐκ εἴπωςσὶν θεοί [εἴπως δοκεῖ, πλέωμεν 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Philoctetes” 526; εἴπως Φαῖδρον ἀγνοῶ, καὶ ἐμαυτοῦ ἐπιλέλησμαι 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Phaedrus” 228a; κάκιστ᾽ ἀπολοίμην, Ξανθίαν εἴπως μὴ φιλῶ 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Ranae” 579, compare 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 17.475; εἴπως θεοῦ ἦν, οὐκ ἦν αἰσχροκερδής· εἴπως δ᾽ αἰσχροκερδής, οὐκ ἦν θεοῦ 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Respublica” 408c; εἴπως ταῦτα λέγων διαφθείρω τοὺς νέους, ταῦτ᾽ ἂν εἴη βλαβερά [prev. author] “Ap.” 30b, compare 25b ">Refs 8th c.BC+]; εἴπως οὗτοι ὀρθῶς ἀπέστησαν, ὑμεῖς ἂν οὐ χρεὼν ἄρχοιτε if these were right in their revolt, (it would follow that) you rule when you have no right, [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.I.1.b to express a general condition, if ever, whenever, sometimes with present, εἴ τις δύο ἢ καὶ πλείους τις ἡμέρας λογίζεται, μάταιός ἐστιν [Refs 5th c.BC+]: with imperfect, εἴ τίς τι ἠρώτα ἀπεκρίνοντο [Refs 5th c.BC+]: rarely with aorist, [Refs 1st c.BC+]
__B.I.2 with future (much less frequently than ἐάν with subjunctive), either to express a future supposition emphatically, εἴπως φθάσομεν τοὺς πολεμίους κατακαίνοντες οὐδεὶς ἡμῶν ἀποθανεῖται [εἴπως μὴ βοηθήσετε οὐ περιέσται τἀκεῖ 5th c.BC: Thucydides Historicus 6.91; εἴπως αὕτη ἡ πόλις ληφθήσεται, ἔχεται ἡ πᾶσα Σικελία [prev. passage];">Refs 5th c.BC+] in threats or warnings, εἴπως μὴ καθέξεις γλῶσσαν ἔσται σοι κακά [εἴπως τιμωρήσεις Πατρόκλῳ, αὐτὸς ἀποθανῇ 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Apologia” 28c, compare 4th c.BC: Demosthenes Orator 28.21: or, ">Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.I.2.b to express a present intention or expectation, αἶρε πλῆκτρον εἴπως μαχεῖ if you mean to fight, [εἴπως ταῦτ᾽ ἀνατεὶ τῇδε κείσεται κράτη 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Antigone” 485, compare 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.61, 5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus “Hecuba” 863. ">Refs 8th c.BC+]
__B.I.3 with historical tenses, implying that the condition is or was unfulfilled.
__B.I.3.a with imperfect, referring to present time or to continued or repeated action in past time (in [εἴπως μὴ διαίτῃ μετρίᾳ ἐχρῶντο they would not be able to do this (as they do)">Refs 8th c.BC+], if they did not live an abstemious life, [εἴπως μή τι καὶ ναυτικὸν εἶχεν he (from Agamemnon)">Refs 5th c.BC+] would not have been master of islands, if he had not had also some naval force, [Refs 7th c.BC+]; εἴπως ἦσαν ἄνδρες ἀγαθοὶ.. οὐκ ἄν ποτε ταῦτα ἔπασχον if they had been good men, they would never have suffered as they did, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; εἴπως γὰρ ἐγὼ τάδε ᾔδἐ.. οὐκ ἂν ὑπεξέφυγε if I had known this.., [Refs 8th c.BC+]
__B.I.3.b with aorist referring to past time, εἴπως μὴ ἔφυσε θεὸς μέλι.. ἔφασκον γλύσσονα σῦκα πέλεσθαι [Refs 6th c.BC+]; εἴπως μὴ ὑμεῖς ἤλθετε, ἐπορευόμεθα ἂν ἐπὶ βασιλέα had you not come, we should be on our way.., [εἴπως μὴ ἡ ἀρχὴ διὰ ταχέων κατελύθη 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Apologia” 32d, compare 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 5.680, 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 4.364, 4th c.BC: Demosthenes Orator 4.5, 27.63 ">Refs 8th c.BC+]: with pluperfect in apodosi, εἴπως τριάκοντα μόναι μετέπεσον τῶν ψήφων, ἀπεπεφεύγη ἄν [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.I.3.c rarely with pluperfect referring to action finished in past or present time, λοιπὸν δ᾽ ἂν ἦν ἡμῖν ἔτι περὶ τῆς πόλεως διαλεχθῆναι, εἴπως μὴ προτέρα τῶν ἄλλων τὴν εἴπωςρήνην ἐπεποίητο if she had not (as she has done) made peace before the rest, [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.II with SUB[εἴπως is regularly joined with ἄν">Refs 1st c.AD+] (Epic dialect κε, κεν), compare ἐάν: [εἴπωςκαν in Tegean Inscrr. of 4th c.BC (“IG” 5(2).3.16, 31, 6.2, “SIG” 306.34) should be understood as εἴπωςκ ἄν (εἴπως: εἴπωςκ ={οὐ}: οὐκ), since εἴπως δ᾽ ἄν is also found in “IG” 5(2).3.2, 6.45, and εἴπωςκ alone, [prev. work]3.21">Refs 4th c.BC+]; but ἄν (κε, κεν) are frequently absent in [εἴπως with ἄν or κε (ν)) “P.” 4.266, +others; in dialects, αἰ δείλητ᾽ ἀγχωρεῖν “IG” 9(1).334.6 (\_Locrian dialect\_, 5th c.BC)">Refs 8th c.BC+], cf. Foed.Doric dialect cited in [εἴπως μὴ ἀναβῇ 2.13 ">Refs 5th c.BC+]; occasionally in Trag., [Refs 5th c.BC+]; very rarely in Attic dialect Prose, εἴπως ξυστῶσιν αἱ πόλεις [Refs 5th c.BC+]: in later Prose, εἴ τις θελήσῃ [εἴπως φονεύῃ 3rd c.AD: Plotinus Philosophus 2.9.9, compare 5th c.AD: Proclus Philosophus “Inst.” 26. ">NT+3rd c.AD+]
__B.II.1 when the apodosis is future, to express a future condition more distinctly and vividly than εἴπως with optative, but less so than εἴπως with future indicative (above [Refs]; εἴπως δέ κεν ὣς ἕρξῃς καί τοι πείθωνται Ἀχαιοί, γνώσῃ ἔπειθ᾽.. if thou do thus.., thou shalt know, [Refs 8th c.BC+]; ἂν μὴ νῦν ἐθέλωμεν ἐκεῖ πολεμεῖν αὐτῷ, ἐνθάδ᾽ ἴσως ἀναγκασθησόμεθα τοῦτο ποιεῖν if we be not now willing, [εἴπωςρήνης δοκῆτε δεῖσθαι, ἄνευ ὅπλων ἥκετε [prev. work] 3.2.13, compare 5.4.30. ">Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.II.2 when the apodosis is present, denoting customary or repeated action, to express a general condition, if ever, ἤν ποτε δασμὸς ἵκηται, σοὶ τὸ γέρας πολὺ μεῖζον (i.e. ἐστί) whenever a division comes, your prize is (always) greater, [Refs 8th c.BC+]; ἢν ἐγγὺς ἔλθῃ θάνατος, οὐδεὶς βούλεται θνῄσκειν if death come near, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; with ἄν omitted, εἴ περ γάρ τε χόλον.. καταπέψῃ ἀλλά.. ἔχει κότον [Refs 8th c.BC+]
__B.II.2.b with Rhet. present in apodosis, ἐὰν μὴ οἱ φιλόσοφοι βασιλεύσωσιν, οὐκ ἔστι κακῶν παῦλα there is (i.e. can be, will be) no rest.., [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.III with OPTATIVE (never with ἄν in early Gr., later ἐάν with optative, [Refs 5th c.AD+]
__B.III.1 to express a future condition less definitely than ἐάν with subjunctive, usually with optative with ἄν in apodosis, ἦ κεν γηθήσαι Πρίαμος Πριάμοιό τε παῖδες.. εἴπως σφῶιν τάδε πάντα πυθοίατο μαρναμένοιιν surely they would exult, if they should hear.., [εἴπως πράσσοις καλῶς 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus “Prometheus Vinctus” 979; οὐδὲ γὰρ ἄν με ἐπαινοίη, εἴπως ἐξελαύνοιμι τοὺς εὐεργέτας 5th-6th c.BC: Xenophon Historicus “Anabasis” 7.7.11; οἶκος δ᾽ αὐτός, εἴπως φθογγὴν λάβοι, σαφέστατ᾽ ἂν λέξειεν 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus “Agamemnon” 37, etc.">Refs 8th c.BC+]: future optative is falsa lectio in [Refs 5th c.BC+]: with present indicative in apodosis, [Refs 6th c.BC+]: with future indicative, [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.III.1.b in Hom.sometimes with present optative, to express an unfulfilled present condition, εἴπως μὲν νῦν ἐπὶ ἄλλῳ ἀεθλεύοιμεν, ἦ τ᾽ ἂν ἐγὼ τὰ πρῶτα φεροίμην if we were now contending, etc., [εἴπως μὴ κνίζοι (={εἴπως μὴ ἔκνιζε}) 5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus “Medea” 568; also εἴπως ἀναγκαῖον εἴη ἀδικεῖν ἢ ἀδικεῖσθαι, ἑλοίμην ἂν μᾶλλον ἀδικεῖσθαι 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Gorgias” 469c. ">Refs 8th c.BC+]
__B.III.2 when the apodosis is past, denoting customary or repeated action, to express a general condition in past time (corresponding to use of subjunctive in present time, above [Refs]; once in [Refs 8th c.BC+]; εἴπως δέ τινας θορυβουμένους αἴσθοιτο.., κατασβεννύναι τὴν ταραχὴν ἐπειρᾶτο if he should see (whenever he saw) any troops in confusion, he (always) tried, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; εἴ τις ἀντείποι, εὐθὺς ἐτεθνήκει if any one made objection, he was a dead man at once, [εἴπως with \_indicative\_ in this sense see above 1.1 ">Refs 5th c.BC+]: indicative and optative are found in same sentence, ἐμίσει, οὐκ εἴ τις κακῶς πάσχων ἠμύνετο, ἀλλ᾽ εἴ τις εὐεργετούμενος ἀχάριστος φαίνοιτο [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.III.3 in oratio obliqua after past tenses, representing ἐάν with subjunctive or εἴπως with a primary (never an historical) tense of the indicative in oratio recta, ἐλογίζοντο ὡς, εἴπως μὴ μάχοιντο, ἀποστήσοιντο αἱ πόλεις (representing ἐὰν μὴ μαχώμεθα, ἀποστήσονται) [Refs 5th c.BC+]; ἔλεγεν ὅτι, εἴπως βλαβερὰ πεπραχὼς εἴη, δίκαιος εἴη ζημιοῦσθαι (representing εἴπως βλαβερὰ πέπραχε, δίκαιός ἐστι)[Refs]; εἴπως δέ τινα φεύγοντα λήψοιτο, προηγόρευεν ὅτι ὡς πολεμίῳ χρήσοιτο (representing εἴ τινα λήψομαι, χρήσομαι) [Refs]; also, where oratio obliqua is implied in the leading clause, οὐκ ἦν τοῦ πολέμου πέρας Φιλίππῳ, εἴπως μὴ Θηβαίους.. ἐχθροὺς ποιήσειε τῇ πόλει, i.e. Philip thought there would be no end to the war, unless he should make.. (his thought having been ἐὰν μὴ ποιήσω), [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.III.4 with optative with ἄν, only when the clause serves as apodosis as well as protasis,[Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.IV with infinitive, in oratio obliqua, only in [εἴπως γὰρ δὴ δεῖν πάντως περιθεῖναι ἄλλῳ τέῳ τὴν βασιληΐην, [ἔφη] δικαιότερον εἶναι κτλ. 1.129; εἴπως εἶναι τοῦτο μὴ φίλον 2.64, compare 172, 3.105, 108. ">Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.V after Verbs denoting wonder, delight, indignation, disappointment, contentment, and similar emotions, εἴπως with indicative is used instead of ὅτι, to express the object of the feeling in a hypothetical form, θαυμάζω εἴπως μηδεὶς ὑμῶν μήτ᾽ ἐνθυμεῖται μήτ᾽ ὀργίζεται, ὁρῶν.. I wonder that no one of you is either concerned or angry when he sees.., [εἴπως μὴ δίκην δέδωκεν, ἀλλ᾽ εἴπως μὴ καὶ χρυσῷ στεφάνῳ στεφανωθήσεται ἀγανακτεῖ 4th c.BC: Aeschines Orator 3.147 ">Refs 4th c.BC+]: after past tenses, ἐθαύμασε δ᾽ εἴπως μὴ φανερόν ἐστιν [εἴπωςσῄει, εἴπως μὴ.. δόξει 4th c.BC: Demosthenes Orator 19.33; ἐθαύμαζον εἴ τι ἕξει τις χρήσασθαι τῷ λόγῳ 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Phaedo” 95a; οὐδὲ ᾐσχύνθη εἴπως.. ἐπάγει 4th c.BC: Demosthenes Orator 21.105: in oratio obliqua (expressed or implied) with \_optative\_, ἐπεῖπεν ὡς δεινὸν (i.e. εἴη) εἴπως.. μεγαλόψυχος γένοιτο 4th c.BC: Aeschines Orator 2.157; ᾤκτιρον εἴπως ἁλώσοιντο 5th-6th c.BC: Xenophon Historicus “Anabasis” 1.4.7 ">Refs 5th c.BC+]; ἐθαύμαζε δ᾽ εἴ τις ἀρετὴν ἐπαγγελλόμενος ἀργύριον πράττοιτο he wondered that any one should demand money, [Refs]; ἔχαιρον ἀγαπῶν εἴ τις ἐάσοι I rejoiced, being content if any one should let it pass, [Refs 5th c.BC+] —in this use the _negative_ οὐ is also found, ἀγανακτῶ εἴπως ὁ Φίλιππος ἁρπάζων οὐ λυπεῖ [εἴπως οἱ ἐκείνων ξύμμαχοι οὐκ ἀπεροῦσιν 5th c.BC: Thucydides Historicus 1.121; τέρας λέγεις, εἴπως οὐκ ἂν δύναιντο λαθεῖν 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Meno” 91d, etc. ">Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.VI in citing a fact as a ground of argument or appeal, as surely as, since, εἴ ποτ᾽ ἔην γε if there was [as there was], i.e. as sure as there was such an one, [εἴπως τότε κοῦρος ἔα, νῦν αὖτέ με γῆρας ὀπάζει 4.321 ">Refs 8th c.BC+]; πολλοὺς γὰρ οἶκε εἶναι εὐπετέστερον διαβάλλειν ἢ ἕνα, εἴπως Κλεομένεα μὲν μοῦνον οὐκ οἷός τε ἐγένετο διαβαλεῖν, τρεῖς δὲ μυριάδας Ἀθηναίων ἐποίησε τοῦτο it seems easier to deceive many than one, if (as was the fact, i.e. since) he was not able.., [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.VII ELLIPTICAL CONSTRUCTIONS:
__B.VII.1 with apodosis implied in the context, εἴπως having the force of in case, supposing that, πρὸς τὴν πόλιν, εἴπως ἐπιβοηθοῖεν, ἐχώρουν they marched towards the city [so as to meet the citizens], in case they should rush out, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; ἱκέται πρὸς σὲ δεῦρ᾽ ἀφίγμεθα, εἴ τινα πόλιν φράσειας ἡμῖν εὔερον we have come hither to you, in case you should tell us of some fleecy city (i.e. that we might hear of it), [Refs 5th c.BC+]; παρέζεο καὶ λαβὲ γούνων, αἴ κέν πως ἐθέλῃσιν ἐπὶ Τρώεσσιν ἀρῆξαι sit by him and grasp his knees [so as to persuade him], in case he be willing to help the Trojans, [Refs 8th c.BC+]; ἄκουσον καὶ ἐμοῦ, ἐάν σοι ἔτι ταὐτὰ δοκῇ hear me also [that you may assent], in case the same opinion please you, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; ἰδὲ δή, ἐάν σοι ὅπερ ἐμοὶ συνδοκῇ look now, in case you approve what I do, [Refs]
__B.VII.2 with apodosis suppressed for rhetorical reasons, εἴ περ γάρ κ᾽ ἐθέλῃσιν Ὀλύμπιος.. στυφελίξαι if he wish to thrust him away, [he will do so], [Refs 8th c.BC+]; εἴπως μὲν δώσουσι γέρας—· εἴπως δέ κε μὴ δώωσιν, ἐγὼ δέ κεν αὐτὸς ἕλωμαι if they shall give me a prize, [well and good]; but if they give not, then I will take one for myself, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; καὶ ἢν μὲν ξυμβῇ ἡ πεῖρα—· εἴπως δὲ μή.. and if the attempt succeed, [well]; otherwise.., [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.VII.3 with the Verb of the protasis omitted, chiefly in the following expressions:
__B.VII.3.a εἴπως μή except, οὐδὲν ἄλλο σιτέονται, εἴπως μὴ ἰχθῦς μοῦνον [Refs 5th c.BC+]; μὰ τὼ θεώ, εἴπως μὴ Κρίτυλλά γ᾽ [εἴπωςμί]—nay, if I'm not Critylla! i.e. I am, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; εἴπως μὴ ὅσον except only, ἐγὼ μέν μιν οὐκ εἶδον, εἴπως μὴ ὅσον γραφῇ [εἴπως μὴ εἴπως 5th c.BC: Thucydides Historicus 1.17, 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Gorgias” 480b, etc.">Refs 5th c.BC+]; εἴπως μή τι οὖν, ἀλλὰ σμικρόν γέ μοι τῆς ἀρχῆς χάλασον if nothing else, yet.., [εἴπως μὴ ἄρα ἡ τῆς ἀρετῆς ἐπιμέλεια διαφθορά ἐστιν 5th-6th c.BC: Xenophon Historicus “Memorabilia” 1.2.8; εἴπως μή πέρ γε τὸν ὑοσκύαμον χρήματα εἶναι φήσομεν [prev. author] “Oec.” 1.13. ">Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.VII.3.b εἴπως δὲ μή but if not, i.e. otherwise, προηγόρευε τοῖς Λαμψακηνοῖσι μετιέναι Μιλτιάδεα, εἴπως δὲ μή, σφέας πίτυος τρόπον ἀπείλεε ἐκτρίψειν [Refs 5th c.BC+]; after μάλιστα μέν, [Refs 5th c.BC+] —after a preceding _negative_, μὴ τύπτ᾽· εἴπως δὲ μή, σαυτόν ποτ᾽ αἰτιάσει don't beat me; otherwise, you will have yourself to blame, [εἴπως δὲ μή, οὐ θαρροῦντά με ἕξεις 5th-6th c.BC: Xenophon Historicus “Institutio Cyri (Cyropaedia)” 3.1.35; οὔτ᾽ ἐν τῷ ὕδατι τὰ ὅπλα ἦν ἔχειν· εἴπως δὲ μή [prev. author] “An.” 4.3.6, compare 5th c.BC: Thucydides Historicus 1.28, 131, 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Phaedo” 91c. ">Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.VII.3.c εἴπως δέ sometimes stands for εἴπως δὲ μή, εἴπως μὲν βούλεται, ἑψέτω· εἴπως δ᾽, ὅτι βούλεται, τοῦτο ποιείτω [εἴπως δ᾽ οὖν 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Antigone” 722; εἴπως δ᾽ οὕτως 4th c.BC: Aristoteles Philosophus “Ethica Nicomachea” 1094a24 ">Refs 5th c.BC+]; εἴπως δὲ τοῦτο and if so, [Refs 1st c.BC+]
__B.VII.3.d εἴπως γάρ for if so, [Refs]
__B.VII.3.e εἴ τις if any, i. e. as much as or more than any, τῶν γε νῦν αἴ τις ἐπιχθονίων, ὀρθῶς [Refs 5th c.BC+]; εἴ τις ἄλλος, siquis alius, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; also κατ᾽ εἴπως δέ τινα τρόπον in any way, [Refs]
__B.VII.3.f εἴ ποτε or εἴπερ ποτέ now if ever, ἡμῖν δὲ καλῶς, εἴπερ ποτέ, ἔχει.. ἡ ξυναλλαγή [Refs 7th c.BC+]; but in prayers, εἴ ποτέ τοι ἐπὶ νηὸν ἔρεψα.. τόδε μοι κρήηνον ἐέλδωρ [Refs 8th c.BC+]
__B.VII.3.g εἴ ποθεν (i.e. δυνατόν ἐστι) if from any quarter, i.e. from some quarter or other, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; so εἴ ποθι somewhere, anywhere, [Refs 8th c.BC+]
__B.VII.3.h εἴ πως[Refs 5th c.BC+]: in an elliptical sentence (cf. VII. [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.VIII with other PARTICLES:
__B.VIII.1 for the distinction between καὶ εἴπως (or καὶ ἐάν, or κἄν) even if, and εἴπως καί (or ἐὰν καί) even though, see at {καί}:—the opposite of καὶ εἴπως is οὐδ᾽ εἴπως, not even if; that of εἴπως καί is εἴπως μηδέ, if (although) not even.
__B.VIII.2 for ὡς εἴπως, ὡς εἴ τε, ὥσπερ εἴπως, etc., see at {ὡς} and ὥσπερ.
__B.VIII.3 for εἴπως ἄρα, see at {ἄρα}; for εἴπως δή, εἴπερ, see at {εἴπως δή, εἴπερ}; for εἴ γε, see at {γέ}.
__B.IX in negative oaths, = Hebrew im, [LXX+NT]
__C IN INDIRECT QUESTIONS, whether, followed by the indicative, subjunctive, or optative, according to the principles of oratio obliqua:
__C.1 with IN[εἴπως θεός ἐστιν">Refs 4th c.BC+] whether he is a god, [εἴπως ξυμπονήσεις.. σκόπει 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Antigone” 41. ">Refs 8th c.BC+]
__C.2 with SUB[Refs 1st c.AD+]subjunctive in the direct question, τὰ ἐκπώματα οὐκ οἶδ᾽ εἴπως Χρυσάντᾳ τουτῳῒ δῶ whether I should give them, [εἴπως στρατεύηται ἐπὶ τοὺς Πέρσας 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 1.75. ">Refs 5th c.BC+]
__C.3 OPT. after past tenses, representing either of the two previous constructions in the direct question, ἤρετο εἴ τις ἐμοῦ εἴη σοφώτερος he asked whether any one was wiser than I (direct ἔστι τις σοφώτερο;), [εἴπως βούλοιτό οἱ τὴν θυγατέρα ἔχειν γυναῖκα 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 1.60: rarely ">Refs 5th c.BC+]aorist optative for the aorist indicative, ἠρώτων αὐτὸν εἴπως ἀναπλεύσειεν I asked him whether he had set sail (direct ἀνέπλευσα;), [Refs 4th c.BC+]aorist optative usually represents aorist subjunctive, τὸν θεὸν ἐπήροντο εἴπως παραδοῖεν Κορινθίοις τὴν πόλιν.. καὶ τιμωρίαν τινὰ πειρῷντ᾽ ἀπ᾽ αὐτῶν ποιεῖσθαι they asked whether they should deliver their city to the Corinthians, and should try.., [Refs 5th c.BC+] —in both constructions the _indicative_ or subjunctive may be retained, ψῆφον ἐβούλοντο ἐπαγαγεῖν εἴπως χρὴ πολεμεῖν[Refs]; ἐβουλεύοντο εἴτε κατακαύσωσιν.. εἴτε τι ἄλλο χρήσωνται whether they should burn them or should dispose of them in some other way, [Refs]; ἀνακοινοῦσθαι αὐτὸν αὑτῷ εἴπως δῷ ἐπιψηφίσαι τοῖς προέδροις [he said that] he consulted him whether he should give.., [Refs 4th c.BC+]
__C.4 with OPT. and ἄν when this was the form of the direct question, ἠρώτων εἴπως δοῖεν ἂν τούτων τὰ πιστά they asked whether they would give (direct δοιήτε ἄ;), [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__C.5 the NEG. used with εἴπως in indirect questions is οὐ, when οὐ would be used in the direct question, ἐνετέλλετο.. εἴπωςρωτᾶν εἴπως οὔ τι ἐπαισχύνεται whether he is not ashamed, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; but if μή would be required in the direct form, it is retained in the indirect, οὐ τοῦτο ἐρωτῶ, ἀλλ᾽ εἴπως τοῦ μὲν δικαίου μὴ ἀξιοῖ πλέον ἔχειν μηδὲ βούλεται ὁ δίκαιος, τοῦ δὲ ἀδίκου (the direct question would be μὴ ἀξιοῖ μηδὲ βούλετα; he does not see fit nor wish, does he?) [Refs 5th c.BC+]:—in double indirect questions, εἴτε.. εἴτε..; εἴπως.. εἴτε..; εἴτε.. ἢ.., either οὐ or μή can be used in the second clause, ὅπως ἴδῃς εἴτ᾽ ἔνδον εἴτ᾽ οὐκ ἔνδον [εἴπως ἡμῖν πρέπει ἢ οὔ 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Respublica” 451d ">Refs 5th c.BC+]; εἴπως ἀληθὲς ἢ μή, πειράσομαι μαθεῖν[εἴπως παρ᾽ ἐκείνῳ διῃτᾶτο ἢ οὔ, καὶ γάμους εἴπως διττοὺς ὑπὲρ ταύτης εἱστίασεν ἢ μὴ.. πάντα ταῦτα εἴπωςδέναι τοὺς οἰκέτας 4th c.BC: Isaeus Orator 8.9 ">Refs 4th c.BC+]; τοὺς νόμους καταμανθάνειν εἴπως καλῶς κεῖνται ἢ μή.. τοὺς λόγους εἴπως ὀρθῶς ὑμᾶς διδάσκουσιν ἢ οὔ [Refs 5th c.BC+]

_{LSJ Scripture Refs: Rev.11.5 ☩ LXX.Ps.94.11* ☩ Mark.8.12}