Lexical Definition

‎μὴ οὐκ‎ mḕ ouk (ouk) isn't it? G:PRT-N + G:PRT-N
i.e. ‎μή‎ and ‎οὐ‎

neither (followed by no), + never, not.

Usage: 6 forms in 10 verses
Form Translated As     In Verse(s)
ουχί Are not LXX.1Chr.21.3
Is this not LXX.Zech.3.2
μη ουχί Is it not that LXX.Job.22.12LXX.Jer.23.24
μη ουκ αποστή μη ουκ αποστή if should you not remove LXX.1Sam.6.3
μη ουκ Is not LXX.Isa.50.2
not LXX.Isa.59.1
not so LXX.Amos.2.11
μη ου lest LXX.1Sam.20.3
μη is it not LXX.Eccl.6.6

Abbott-Smith

μὴ οὐκ, v.s. μή, III.

Liddell-Scott-Jones

combination of: οὐ (μή+οὐ)

Included with: μὴ οὐ is used of an apprehended negative:

__I with finite forms of the Verb, after Verbs expressing fear or apprehension [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__I.a mostly with subjunctive, δείδω μὴ οὔ τίς τοι ὑπόσχηται τόδε ἔργον [μὴ οὐκκ ἔχοιεν ὁπόθεν λαμβάνοιεν 5th-6th c.BC: Xenophon Historicus “Anabasis” 3.5.3, etc.">Refs 8th c.BC+]: with future optative representing future indicative in indirect speech, μὴ οὐκ ὀρθῶς αὐτὸ ποιήσοις [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__I.b with indicative, ὁρᾶτε μὴ οὐκ ἐμοὶ μάλιστα τῶν πολιτῶν προσήκει [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__I.2 without introductory Verb, with subjunctive, μή νύ τοι οὐ χραίσμῃ [Refs 8th c.BC+]; also to suggest hesitation, perhaps [μὴ οὐκ τοῦτο ᾖ τὸ χρηστήριον 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 5.79, compare 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Phaedo” 67b, “Smp.” 194c, 214c, etc.: also with \_indicative\_, μὴ τοῦτο οὐ καλῶς ὡμολογήσαμεν [prev. author] “Men.” 89c. ">Refs 5th c.BC+]
__I.3 μή is sometimes doubled, irregularly, for μὴ οὐ, ἐθαύμαζε δ᾽ εἴτις.. φοβοῖτο, μὴ γενόμενος καλὸς κἀγαθὸς.. μὴ τὴν μεγίστην χάριν ἔχοι [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__II after a negative expressed or implied:
__II.1 with infinitive,
__II.1.a after Verbs of hindering, denying, avoiding, needing, when these Verbs are themselves negatived or questioned, οὐκέτι ἀνεβάλλοντο μὴ οὐ τὸ πᾶν μηχανήσασθαι they no longer hesitated to try every expedient, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; τί δῆτα μέλλεις μὴ οὐ γεγωνίσκει; [μὴ οὐκ καλῶς λέγεσθαι 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Meno” 89d, compare “Phd.” 87a; πολλοῦ δέω μὴ οὐκ δύο γε φεύγειν [prev. author] “Euthd.” 297b ">Refs 5th c.BC+]; τίνος ἐνδέομεν μὴ οὐ πανσυδίᾳ χωρεῖ; [Refs 5th c.BC+]; after ὥστε, [Refs 5th c.BC+]: with the Article, οὐκ ἐναντιώσομαι τὸ μὴ οὐ γεγωνεῖν πᾶν [μὴ οὐκ μεγάλην εἶναι 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Aves” 37 ">Refs 5th c.BC+]; τοῖς θεοῖς οὐδὲν ἂν ἔχοιμεν μέμψασθαι τὸ μὴ οὐχί.. [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__II.1.b after Verbs and phrases signifying impossibility, impropriety, reluctance, when not negatived, ἄνδρα δ᾽ οὐκ ἔστι μὴ οὐ κακὸν ἔμμεναι [μὴ οὐκ λαβεῖν 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 1.187; ἔστι οὐδεμία μηχανὴ μὴ οὐκκ ἀπολωλέναι [prev. author] 2.181, compare 3.51, 7.5; οὐδεὶς ἂν τολμήσειεν μὴ οὐκ χρῆσθαι τῷ νόμῳ 5th c.BC: Antipho Orator 5.87, compare 5th c.BC: Thucydides Historicus 8.60; αἰσχύνη ἦν μὴ οὐκ συσπουδάζειν 5th-6th c.BC: Xenophon Historicus “Anabasis” 2.3.11; αἰσχρόν ἐστι μὴ οὐκκ ἄλλας πληγὰς ἐμβάλλειν τῷ υἱεῖ [prev. author] “Lac.” 6.2 ">Refs 5th c.BC+]; οὐδεὶς οἷός τ᾽ ἐστὶν ἄλλως λέγων μὴ οὐ (nemo potest non) καταγέλαστος εἶναι [Refs 5th c.BC+]: after an implied negative, μὴ οὐχὶ παντὶ τρόπῳ ἐλέγχειν μαλθακοῦ εἶναι ἀνδρός [μὴ οὐκχὶ πρόβατα εἶναι διαφερόντων 2nd c.AD: Lucianus Sophista “Alex.” 15 ">Refs 2nd c.AD+]; after ὥστε, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; μή and μὴ οὐκ in consecutive clauses, [Refs]: with the Article, οὐκ ἀνέξομαι τὸ μὴ οὐ.. τιμᾶν [Refs 4th c.BC+]; οὐδείς γέ μ᾽ ἂν πείσειεν.. τὸ μὴ οὐ.. [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__II.2 less frequently with participle after a negative expressed or implied, οὔκων δίκαιον [ἀνδριάντα] ἱστάναι.. μὴ οὐκ ὑπερβαλλόμενον τοῖσι ἔργοισι [μὴ οὐκ κατοικτείρων ἕδραν 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Oedipus Tyrannus” 13, compare 221, “OC” 360, 5th-6th c.BC: Isocrates Orator 10.47 (uncertain reading), 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Lysis” 212d, 4th-3rd c.BC: Philemo Comicus 213.5: hence ">Refs 5th c.BC+]
__II.3 = {εἰ μή}, except, πόλεις.. χαλεπαὶ λαβεῖν, μὴ οὐ χρόνῳ καὶ πολιορκίᾳ [Refs 4th c.BC+]
__III in questions expecting an affirmative answer, [LXX+NT+5th c.BC+]

LSJ Scripture Refs: LXX.Judg.14.31Cor.9.4