Lexical Definition
λοιδορέω loidoréō (loy-dor-eh'-o) to revile G:V
from λοίδορος
revile.
- to reproach, i.e. vilify
| Form | Translated As | In Verse(s) |
|---|---|---|
| ἐλοιδόρησαν | railed at | John.9.28 |
| λοιδορώνται | revile | LXX.Exod.21.18 |
| λοιδορούμενοσ | being reviled | 1Pet.2.23 |
| λοιδορούμενοι | Being reviled | 1Cor.4.12 |
| λοιδορεῖσ | do you insult | Acts.23.4 |
| λοιδορείσθέ | do you revile | LXX.Exod.17.2 |
| ελοιδόρουν | reviled | LXX.Gen.49.23 |
| ελοιδόρησαν | they reviled | LXX.Deut.33.8 |
| ελοιδορείτο | reviled | LXX.Exod.17.2 • LXX.Num.20.3 |
| ελοιδορήθησαν | were reviled | LXX.Num.20.13 |
Abbott-Smith
λοιδορέω, -ῶ (< λοίδορος), [in LXX chiefly for רִיב;]
to abuse, revile: c. acc. pers., Jo 9:28, Ac 23:4; pass., I Co 4:12, I Pe 2:23 (cf. ἀντι-λοιδορέω).†
Abbott-Smith References
| Book | Refs |
|---|---|
| John | 9:28 |
| Acts | 23:4 |
| 1 Corinthians | 4:12 |
| 1 Peter | 2:23 |
Liddell-Scott-Jones
λοιδορέω-έω,
future -ήσω [Refs 4th c.BC+]: aorist ἐλοιδόρησα [Refs 5th c.BC+]: perfect λελοιδόρηκα [Refs 5th c.BC+] —middle and passive (see. below), future -ήσομαι [Refs 5th c.BC+]: aorist ἐλοιδορέωησάμην [Refs 4th c.BC+]; Attic dialect more frequently ἐλοισορήθην [Refs 4th c.BC+]: (λοίδορος):—abuse, revile, τινα [Refs 5th c.BC+], etc.: absolutely, [Refs 5th c.BC+] [same place], etc.; sometimes simply, rebuke, [Refs 5th c.BC+]: with neuter adjective, ἐμαυτὸν πόλλ᾽ ἐλοιδόρησα [Refs 5th c.BC+] reproach fortune as blind, [Refs 1st c.AD+]:—middle, rail at one another, [Refs 5th c.BC+] —passive, λοιδορέωοῦντας ἢ λοιδορέωουμένους reviling or reviled, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; λελοιδορέωημένος ὑπὸ.. rebuked.., [λοιδορέωηθείς 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Phaedrus” 275e, compare “Grg.” 457d. ">Refs 5th c.BC+]
__II middle with aorist passive in active sense, with dative person, rail at, τινι [Refs 5th c.BC+]; τινος [λοιδορέωέονται, ὅτι">LXX+2nd c.AD+].. they use all kind of foul reproaches, saying that.., [λοιδορέωίαν ἣν ἐλοιδορέωήθη Κρατίνῳ περὶ τούτων 4th c.BC: Demosthenes Orator 21.132. ">Refs 5th c.BC+]—active never has dative except in later Gr., [LXX+5th c.BC+] (ἠναντιώθην καὶ ἀντεῖπον —καὶ ἐλοιδόρησα—ἐκείνῳ ὧν ἦν ἄξιος) the dative (if correct) depends on the other verbs; as does the accusative in οὓς ὕβριζες καὶ ἐλοιδορέωοῦ [Refs 4th c.BC+] —Only the active is found in Trag.
LSJ Scripture Refs: LXX.Exod.17.2 ☩ LXX.Exod.17.2