Liddell-Scott-Jones

εἰ μήν (ei mēn) is it not? ^TEGMC
combination of: μήν (εἰ+μήν)

Related to: εἰ μήν,

Attic dialect-Ionic dialect and [εἰ μήνκ, see below 11 ad [near the start]), = \_Doric dialect\_ and \_Aeolic dialect\_ αἰ, αἰκ (which see), 5th c.AD: Cypria ">Refs 4th c.AD+] ἤ [εἰ μήν and αἰ">Refs] in Epic dialect:— Particle used interjectionally with imperative and to express a wish, but usually either in conditions, if, or in indirect questions, whether. In the former use its regular negative is μ; in the latter, οὐ.

__A INTERJECTIONALLY, in [Refs 8th c.BC+], come now! with imperative, εἰ μήν δὲ.. ἄκουσον [εἰ μήν δὲ καὶ αὐτοὶ φευγόντων [prev. work] 46; most frequently with ἄγε (which see), 1.302, +others ">Refs 8th c.BC+]
__A.2 in wishes, with optative, ἀλλ᾽ εἴ τις.. καλέσειεν [Refs]; so later, εἴ μοι ξυνείη μοῖρα [εἰ μήν γὰρ γενοίμην ἀντὶ σοῦ νεκρός 5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus “Hippolytus” 1410; εἰ μήν γὰρ γένοιτο 5th-6th c.BC: Xenophon Historicus “Institutio Cyri (Cyropaedia)” 6.1.38; εἰ μήν γὰρ ἐν τούτῳ εἴη 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Protagoras” 310d ">Refs 8th c.BC+]; of unattained wishes, in [εἰ μήν γὰρ ἐγὼν.. Διὸς πάϊς αἰγιόχοιο εἴην 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 13.825; Ζεῦ πάτερ, αἰ γὰρ ἐμὸς πόσις εἴη 7th c.BC: Alcman Lyricus 29 ">Refs 8th c.BC+]; later with past tenses of indicative, εἰ μήν γάρ μ᾽ ὑπὸ γῆν.. ἧκεν [Refs 4th c.BC+]; εἰ μήν γὰρ τοσαύτην δύναμιν εἶχον ὥστε.. [Refs 8th c.BC+]infinitive (compare the use of infinitive in commands), αἰ γὰρ τοῖος ἐὼν.. ἐμὸς γαμβρὸς καλέεσθαι [Refs]
__A.2.b εἴθε, Epic dialect αἴθε, is frequently used in wishes in the above constructions, εἴθε οἱ αὐτῷ Ζεὺς ἀγαθὸν τελέσειεν [Refs 8th c.BC+]: later with infinitive, γαίης χθαμαλωτέρη εἴθε.. κεῖσθαι [Refs 1st c.BC+]
__A.2.c εἰ μήν γάρ, εἴθε are also used with ὤφελον (Epic dialect ὤφελλον), of past unattained wishes, αἴθ᾽ ὤφελλες στρατοῦ ἄλλου σημαίνειν [Refs 8th c.BC+]; εἰ μήν γὰρ ὤφελον [κατιδεῖν] [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__A.2.d followed by a clause expressing a consequence of the fulfilment of the wish, αἰ γὰρ τοῦτο.. ἔπος τετελεσμένον εἴη· τῷ κε τάχα γνοίης.. [Refs 8th c.BC+]; sometimes hard to distinguish from εἰ μήν in conditions (which may be derived from this use), εἴ μοί τι πίθοιο, τό κεν πολὺ κέρδιον εἴη [Refs 8th c.BC+]
__B IN CONDITIONS, if:
__B.I with INDIC.,
__B.I.1 with all tenses (for future, see below [εἰ μήν δ᾽ οὕτω τοῦτ᾽ ἐστίν, ἐμοὶ μέλλει φίλον εἶναι but ">Refs]if this is so, it will be.., [Refs 8th c.BC+]: any form of the Verb may stand in apodosi, εἰ μήν θεοί τι δρῶσιν αἰσχρόν, οὐκ εἰ μήνσὶν θεοί [εἰ μήν δοκεῖ, πλέωμεν 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Philoctetes” 526; εἰ μήν Φαῖδρον ἀγνοῶ, καὶ ἐμαυτοῦ ἐπιλέλησμαι 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Phaedrus” 228a; κάκιστ᾽ ἀπολοίμην, Ξανθίαν εἰ μήν μὴ φιλῶ 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Ranae” 579, compare 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 17.475; εἰ μήν θεοῦ ἦν, οὐκ ἦν αἰσχροκερδής· εἰ μήν δ᾽ αἰσχροκερδής, οὐκ ἦν θεοῦ 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Respublica” 408c; εἰ μήν ταῦτα λέγων διαφθείρω τοὺς νέους, ταῦτ᾽ ἂν εἴη βλαβερά [prev. author] “Ap.” 30b, compare 25b ">Refs 8th c.BC+]; εἰ μήν οὗτοι ὀρθῶς ἀπέστησαν, ὑμεῖς ἂν οὐ χρεὼν ἄρχοιτε if these were right in their revolt, (it would follow that) you rule when you have no right, [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.I.1.b to express a general condition, if ever, whenever, sometimes with present, εἴ τις δύο ἢ καὶ πλείους τις ἡμέρας λογίζεται, μάταιός ἐστιν [Refs 5th c.BC+]: with imperfect, εἴ τίς τι ἠρώτα ἀπεκρίνοντο [Refs 5th c.BC+]: rarely with aorist, [Refs 1st c.BC+]
__B.I.2 with future (much less frequently than ἐάν with subjunctive), either to express a future supposition emphatically, εἰ μήν φθάσομεν τοὺς πολεμίους κατακαίνοντες οὐδεὶς ἡμῶν ἀποθανεῖται [εἰ μήν μὴ βοηθήσετε οὐ περιέσται τἀκεῖ 5th c.BC: Thucydides Historicus 6.91; εἰ μήν αὕτη ἡ πόλις ληφθήσεται, ἔχεται ἡ πᾶσα Σικελία [prev. passage];">Refs 5th c.BC+] in threats or warnings, εἰ μήν μὴ καθέξεις γλῶσσαν ἔσται σοι κακά [εἰ μήν τιμωρήσεις Πατρόκλῳ, αὐτὸς ἀποθανῇ 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Apologia” 28c, compare 4th c.BC: Demosthenes Orator 28.21: or, ">Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.I.2.b to express a present intention or expectation, αἶρε πλῆκτρον εἰ μήν μαχεῖ if you mean to fight, [εἰ μήν ταῦτ᾽ ἀνατεὶ τῇδε κείσεται κράτη 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Antigone” 485, compare 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.61, 5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus “Hecuba” 863. ">Refs 8th c.BC+]
__B.I.3 with historical tenses, implying that the condition is or was unfulfilled.
__B.I.3.a with imperfect, referring to present time or to continued or repeated action in past time (in [εἰ μήν μὴ διαίτῃ μετρίᾳ ἐχρῶντο they would not be able to do this (as they do)">Refs 8th c.BC+], if they did not live an abstemious life, [εἰ μήν μή τι καὶ ναυτικὸν εἶχεν he (from Agamemnon)">Refs 5th c.BC+] would not have been master of islands, if he had not had also some naval force, [Refs 7th c.BC+]; εἰ μήν ἦσαν ἄνδρες ἀγαθοὶ.. οὐκ ἄν ποτε ταῦτα ἔπασχον if they had been good men, they would never have suffered as they did, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; εἰ μήν γὰρ ἐγὼ τάδε ᾔδἐ.. οὐκ ἂν ὑπεξέφυγε if I had known this.., [Refs 8th c.BC+]
__B.I.3.b with aorist referring to past time, εἰ μήν μὴ ἔφυσε θεὸς μέλι.. ἔφασκον γλύσσονα σῦκα πέλεσθαι [Refs 6th c.BC+]; εἰ μήν μὴ ὑμεῖς ἤλθετε, ἐπορευόμεθα ἂν ἐπὶ βασιλέα had you not come, we should be on our way.., [εἰ μήν μὴ ἡ ἀρχὴ διὰ ταχέων κατελύθη 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Apologia” 32d, compare 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 5.680, 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 4.364, 4th c.BC: Demosthenes Orator 4.5, 27.63 ">Refs 8th c.BC+]: with pluperfect in apodosi, εἰ μήν τριάκοντα μόναι μετέπεσον τῶν ψήφων, ἀπεπεφεύγη ἄν [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.I.3.c rarely with pluperfect referring to action finished in past or present time, λοιπὸν δ᾽ ἂν ἦν ἡμῖν ἔτι περὶ τῆς πόλεως διαλεχθῆναι, εἰ μήν μὴ προτέρα τῶν ἄλλων τὴν εἰ μήνρήνην ἐπεποίητο if she had not (as she has done) made peace before the rest, [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.II with SUB[εἰ μήν is regularly joined with ἄν">Refs 1st c.AD+] (Epic dialect κε, κεν), compare ἐάν: [εἰ μήνκαν in Tegean Inscrr. of 4th c.BC (“IG” 5(2).3.16, 31, 6.2, “SIG” 306.34) should be understood as εἰ μήνκ ἄν (εἰ μήν: εἰ μήνκ ={οὐ}: οὐκ), since εἰ μήν δ᾽ ἄν is also found in “IG” 5(2).3.2, 6.45, and εἰ μήνκ alone, [prev. work]3.21">Refs 4th c.BC+]; but ἄν (κε, κεν) are frequently absent in [εἰ μήν with ἄν or κε (ν)) “P.” 4.266, +others; in dialects, αἰ δείλητ᾽ ἀγχωρεῖν “IG” 9(1).334.6 (\_Locrian dialect\_, 5th c.BC)">Refs 8th c.BC+], cf. Foed.Doric dialect cited in [εἰ μήν μὴ ἀναβῇ 2.13 ">Refs 5th c.BC+]; occasionally in Trag., [Refs 5th c.BC+]; very rarely in Attic dialect Prose, εἰ μήν ξυστῶσιν αἱ πόλεις [Refs 5th c.BC+]: in later Prose, εἴ τις θελήσῃ [εἰ μήν φονεύῃ 3rd c.AD: Plotinus Philosophus 2.9.9, compare 5th c.AD: Proclus Philosophus “Inst.” 26. ">NT+3rd c.AD+]
__B.II.1 when the apodosis is future, to express a future condition more distinctly and vividly than εἰ μήν with optative, but less so than εἰ μήν with future indicative (above [Refs]; εἰ μήν δέ κεν ὣς ἕρξῃς καί τοι πείθωνται Ἀχαιοί, γνώσῃ ἔπειθ᾽.. if thou do thus.., thou shalt know, [Refs 8th c.BC+]; ἂν μὴ νῦν ἐθέλωμεν ἐκεῖ πολεμεῖν αὐτῷ, ἐνθάδ᾽ ἴσως ἀναγκασθησόμεθα τοῦτο ποιεῖν if we be not now willing, [εἰ μήνρήνης δοκῆτε δεῖσθαι, ἄνευ ὅπλων ἥκετε [prev. work] 3.2.13, compare 5.4.30. ">Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.II.2 when the apodosis is present, denoting customary or repeated action, to express a general condition, if ever, ἤν ποτε δασμὸς ἵκηται, σοὶ τὸ γέρας πολὺ μεῖζον (i.e. ἐστί) whenever a division comes, your prize is (always) greater, [Refs 8th c.BC+]; ἢν ἐγγὺς ἔλθῃ θάνατος, οὐδεὶς βούλεται θνῄσκειν if death come near, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; with ἄν omitted, εἴ περ γάρ τε χόλον.. καταπέψῃ ἀλλά.. ἔχει κότον [Refs 8th c.BC+]
__B.II.2.b with Rhet. present in apodosis, ἐὰν μὴ οἱ φιλόσοφοι βασιλεύσωσιν, οὐκ ἔστι κακῶν παῦλα there is (i.e. can be, will be) no rest.., [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.III with OPTATIVE (never with ἄν in early Gr., later ἐάν with optative, [Refs 5th c.AD+]
__B.III.1 to express a future condition less definitely than ἐάν with subjunctive, usually with optative with ἄν in apodosis, ἦ κεν γηθήσαι Πρίαμος Πριάμοιό τε παῖδες.. εἰ μήν σφῶιν τάδε πάντα πυθοίατο μαρναμένοιιν surely they would exult, if they should hear.., [εἰ μήν πράσσοις καλῶς 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus “Prometheus Vinctus” 979; οὐδὲ γὰρ ἄν με ἐπαινοίη, εἰ μήν ἐξελαύνοιμι τοὺς εὐεργέτας 5th-6th c.BC: Xenophon Historicus “Anabasis” 7.7.11; οἶκος δ᾽ αὐτός, εἰ μήν φθογγὴν λάβοι, σαφέστατ᾽ ἂν λέξειεν 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus “Agamemnon” 37, etc.">Refs 8th c.BC+]: future optative is falsa lectio in [Refs 5th c.BC+]: with present indicative in apodosis, [Refs 6th c.BC+]: with future indicative, [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.III.1.b in Hom.sometimes with present optative, to express an unfulfilled present condition, εἰ μήν μὲν νῦν ἐπὶ ἄλλῳ ἀεθλεύοιμεν, ἦ τ᾽ ἂν ἐγὼ τὰ πρῶτα φεροίμην if we were now contending, etc., [εἰ μήν μὴ κνίζοι (={εἰ μήν μὴ ἔκνιζε}) 5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus “Medea” 568; also εἰ μήν ἀναγκαῖον εἴη ἀδικεῖν ἢ ἀδικεῖσθαι, ἑλοίμην ἂν μᾶλλον ἀδικεῖσθαι 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Gorgias” 469c. ">Refs 8th c.BC+]
__B.III.2 when the apodosis is past, denoting customary or repeated action, to express a general condition in past time (corresponding to use of subjunctive in present time, above [Refs]; once in [Refs 8th c.BC+]; εἰ μήν δέ τινας θορυβουμένους αἴσθοιτο.., κατασβεννύναι τὴν ταραχὴν ἐπειρᾶτο if he should see (whenever he saw) any troops in confusion, he (always) tried, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; εἴ τις ἀντείποι, εὐθὺς ἐτεθνήκει if any one made objection, he was a dead man at once, [εἰ μήν with \_indicative\_ in this sense see above 1.1 ">Refs 5th c.BC+]: indicative and optative are found in same sentence, ἐμίσει, οὐκ εἴ τις κακῶς πάσχων ἠμύνετο, ἀλλ᾽ εἴ τις εὐεργετούμενος ἀχάριστος φαίνοιτο [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.III.3 in oratio obliqua after past tenses, representing ἐάν with subjunctive or εἰ μήν with a primary (never an historical) tense of the indicative in oratio recta, ἐλογίζοντο ὡς, εἰ μήν μὴ μάχοιντο, ἀποστήσοιντο αἱ πόλεις (representing ἐὰν μὴ μαχώμεθα, ἀποστήσονται) [Refs 5th c.BC+]; ἔλεγεν ὅτι, εἰ μήν βλαβερὰ πεπραχὼς εἴη, δίκαιος εἴη ζημιοῦσθαι (representing εἰ μήν βλαβερὰ πέπραχε, δίκαιός ἐστι)[Refs]; εἰ μήν δέ τινα φεύγοντα λήψοιτο, προηγόρευεν ὅτι ὡς πολεμίῳ χρήσοιτο (representing εἴ τινα λήψομαι, χρήσομαι) [Refs]; also, where oratio obliqua is implied in the leading clause, οὐκ ἦν τοῦ πολέμου πέρας Φιλίππῳ, εἰ μήν μὴ Θηβαίους.. ἐχθροὺς ποιήσειε τῇ πόλει, i.e. Philip thought there would be no end to the war, unless he should make.. (his thought having been ἐὰν μὴ ποιήσω), [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.III.4 with optative with ἄν, only when the clause serves as apodosis as well as protasis,[Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.IV with infinitive, in oratio obliqua, only in [εἰ μήν γὰρ δὴ δεῖν πάντως περιθεῖναι ἄλλῳ τέῳ τὴν βασιληΐην, [ἔφη] δικαιότερον εἶναι κτλ. 1.129; εἰ μήν εἶναι τοῦτο μὴ φίλον 2.64, compare 172, 3.105, 108. ">Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.V after Verbs denoting wonder, delight, indignation, disappointment, contentment, and similar emotions, εἰ μήν with indicative is used instead of ὅτι, to express the object of the feeling in a hypothetical form, θαυμάζω εἰ μήν μηδεὶς ὑμῶν μήτ᾽ ἐνθυμεῖται μήτ᾽ ὀργίζεται, ὁρῶν.. I wonder that no one of you is either concerned or angry when he sees.., [εἰ μήν μὴ δίκην δέδωκεν, ἀλλ᾽ εἰ μήν μὴ καὶ χρυσῷ στεφάνῳ στεφανωθήσεται ἀγανακτεῖ 4th c.BC: Aeschines Orator 3.147 ">Refs 4th c.BC+]: after past tenses, ἐθαύμασε δ᾽ εἰ μήν μὴ φανερόν ἐστιν [εἰ μήνσῄει, εἰ μήν μὴ.. δόξει 4th c.BC: Demosthenes Orator 19.33; ἐθαύμαζον εἴ τι ἕξει τις χρήσασθαι τῷ λόγῳ 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Phaedo” 95a; οὐδὲ ᾐσχύνθη εἰ μήν.. ἐπάγει 4th c.BC: Demosthenes Orator 21.105: in oratio obliqua (expressed or implied) with \_optative\_, ἐπεῖπεν ὡς δεινὸν (i.e. εἴη) εἰ μήν.. μεγαλόψυχος γένοιτο 4th c.BC: Aeschines Orator 2.157; ᾤκτιρον εἰ μήν ἁλώσοιντο 5th-6th c.BC: Xenophon Historicus “Anabasis” 1.4.7 ">Refs 5th c.BC+]; ἐθαύμαζε δ᾽ εἴ τις ἀρετὴν ἐπαγγελλόμενος ἀργύριον πράττοιτο he wondered that any one should demand money, [Refs]; ἔχαιρον ἀγαπῶν εἴ τις ἐάσοι I rejoiced, being content if any one should let it pass, [Refs 5th c.BC+] —in this use the _negative_ οὐ is also found, ἀγανακτῶ εἰ μήν ὁ Φίλιππος ἁρπάζων οὐ λυπεῖ [εἰ μήν οἱ ἐκείνων ξύμμαχοι οὐκ ἀπεροῦσιν 5th c.BC: Thucydides Historicus 1.121; τέρας λέγεις, εἰ μήν οὐκ ἂν δύναιντο λαθεῖν 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Meno” 91d, etc. ">Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.VI in citing a fact as a ground of argument or appeal, as surely as, since, εἴ ποτ᾽ ἔην γε if there was [as there was], i.e. as sure as there was such an one, [εἰ μήν τότε κοῦρος ἔα, νῦν αὖτέ με γῆρας ὀπάζει 4.321 ">Refs 8th c.BC+]; πολλοὺς γὰρ οἶκε εἶναι εὐπετέστερον διαβάλλειν ἢ ἕνα, εἰ μήν Κλεομένεα μὲν μοῦνον οὐκ οἷός τε ἐγένετο διαβαλεῖν, τρεῖς δὲ μυριάδας Ἀθηναίων ἐποίησε τοῦτο it seems easier to deceive many than one, if (as was the fact, i.e. since) he was not able.., [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.VII ELLIPTICAL CONSTRUCTIONS:
__B.VII.1 with apodosis implied in the context, εἰ μήν having the force of in case, supposing that, πρὸς τὴν πόλιν, εἰ μήν ἐπιβοηθοῖεν, ἐχώρουν they marched towards the city [so as to meet the citizens], in case they should rush out, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; ἱκέται πρὸς σὲ δεῦρ᾽ ἀφίγμεθα, εἴ τινα πόλιν φράσειας ἡμῖν εὔερον we have come hither to you, in case you should tell us of some fleecy city (i.e. that we might hear of it), [Refs 5th c.BC+]; παρέζεο καὶ λαβὲ γούνων, αἴ κέν πως ἐθέλῃσιν ἐπὶ Τρώεσσιν ἀρῆξαι sit by him and grasp his knees [so as to persuade him], in case he be willing to help the Trojans, [Refs 8th c.BC+]; ἄκουσον καὶ ἐμοῦ, ἐάν σοι ἔτι ταὐτὰ δοκῇ hear me also [that you may assent], in case the same opinion please you, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; ἰδὲ δή, ἐάν σοι ὅπερ ἐμοὶ συνδοκῇ look now, in case you approve what I do, [Refs]
__B.VII.2 with apodosis suppressed for rhetorical reasons, εἴ περ γάρ κ᾽ ἐθέλῃσιν Ὀλύμπιος.. στυφελίξαι if he wish to thrust him away, [he will do so], [Refs 8th c.BC+]; εἰ μήν μὲν δώσουσι γέρας—· εἰ μήν δέ κε μὴ δώωσιν, ἐγὼ δέ κεν αὐτὸς ἕλωμαι if they shall give me a prize, [well and good]; but if they give not, then I will take one for myself, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; καὶ ἢν μὲν ξυμβῇ ἡ πεῖρα—· εἰ μήν δὲ μή.. and if the attempt succeed, [well]; otherwise.., [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.VII.3 with the Verb of the protasis omitted, chiefly in the following expressions:
__B.VII.3.a εἰ μήν μή except, οὐδὲν ἄλλο σιτέονται, εἰ μήν μὴ ἰχθῦς μοῦνον [Refs 5th c.BC+]; μὰ τὼ θεώ, εἰ μήν μὴ Κρίτυλλά γ᾽ [εἰ μήνμί]—nay, if I'm not Critylla! i.e. I am, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; εἰ μήν μὴ ὅσον except only, ἐγὼ μέν μιν οὐκ εἶδον, εἰ μήν μὴ ὅσον γραφῇ [εἰ μήν μὴ εἰ μήν 5th c.BC: Thucydides Historicus 1.17, 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Gorgias” 480b, etc.">Refs 5th c.BC+]; εἰ μήν μή τι οὖν, ἀλλὰ σμικρόν γέ μοι τῆς ἀρχῆς χάλασον if nothing else, yet.., [εἰ μήν μὴ ἄρα ἡ τῆς ἀρετῆς ἐπιμέλεια διαφθορά ἐστιν 5th-6th c.BC: Xenophon Historicus “Memorabilia” 1.2.8; εἰ μήν μή πέρ γε τὸν ὑοσκύαμον χρήματα εἶναι φήσομεν [prev. author] “Oec.” 1.13. ">Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.VII.3.b εἰ μήν δὲ μή but if not, i.e. otherwise, προηγόρευε τοῖς Λαμψακηνοῖσι μετιέναι Μιλτιάδεα, εἰ μήν δὲ μή, σφέας πίτυος τρόπον ἀπείλεε ἐκτρίψειν [Refs 5th c.BC+]; after μάλιστα μέν, [Refs 5th c.BC+] —after a preceding _negative_, μὴ τύπτ᾽· εἰ μήν δὲ μή, σαυτόν ποτ᾽ αἰτιάσει don't beat me; otherwise, you will have yourself to blame, [εἰ μήν δὲ μή, οὐ θαρροῦντά με ἕξεις 5th-6th c.BC: Xenophon Historicus “Institutio Cyri (Cyropaedia)” 3.1.35; οὔτ᾽ ἐν τῷ ὕδατι τὰ ὅπλα ἦν ἔχειν· εἰ μήν δὲ μή [prev. author] “An.” 4.3.6, compare 5th c.BC: Thucydides Historicus 1.28, 131, 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Phaedo” 91c. ">Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.VII.3.c εἰ μήν δέ sometimes stands for εἰ μήν δὲ μή, εἰ μήν μὲν βούλεται, ἑψέτω· εἰ μήν δ᾽, ὅτι βούλεται, τοῦτο ποιείτω [εἰ μήν δ᾽ οὖν 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Antigone” 722; εἰ μήν δ᾽ οὕτως 4th c.BC: Aristoteles Philosophus “Ethica Nicomachea” 1094a24 ">Refs 5th c.BC+]; εἰ μήν δὲ τοῦτο and if so, [Refs 1st c.BC+]
__B.VII.3.d εἰ μήν γάρ for if so, [Refs]
__B.VII.3.e εἴ τις if any, i. e. as much as or more than any, τῶν γε νῦν αἴ τις ἐπιχθονίων, ὀρθῶς [Refs 5th c.BC+]; εἴ τις ἄλλος, siquis alius, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; also κατ᾽ εἰ μήν δέ τινα τρόπον in any way, [Refs]
__B.VII.3.f εἴ ποτε or εἴπερ ποτέ now if ever, ἡμῖν δὲ καλῶς, εἴπερ ποτέ, ἔχει.. ἡ ξυναλλαγή [Refs 7th c.BC+]; but in prayers, εἴ ποτέ τοι ἐπὶ νηὸν ἔρεψα.. τόδε μοι κρήηνον ἐέλδωρ [Refs 8th c.BC+]
__B.VII.3.g εἴ ποθεν (i.e. δυνατόν ἐστι) if from any quarter, i.e. from some quarter or other, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; so εἴ ποθι somewhere, anywhere, [Refs 8th c.BC+]
__B.VII.3.h εἴ πως[Refs 5th c.BC+]: in an elliptical sentence (cf. VII. [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__B.VIII with other PARTICLES:
__B.VIII.1 for the distinction between καὶ εἰ μήν (or καὶ ἐάν, or κἄν) even if, and εἰ μήν καί (or ἐὰν καί) even though, see at {καί}:—the opposite of καὶ εἰ μήν is οὐδ᾽ εἰ μήν, not even if; that of εἰ μήν καί is εἰ μήν μηδέ, if (although) not even.
__B.VIII.2 for ὡς εἰ μήν, ὡς εἴ τε, ὥσπερ εἰ μήν, etc., see at {ὡς} and ὥσπερ.
__B.VIII.3 for εἰ μήν ἄρα, see at {ἄρα}; for εἰ μήν δή, εἴπερ, see at {εἰ μήν δή, εἴπερ}; for εἴ γε, see at {γέ}.
__B.IX in negative oaths, = Hebrew im, [LXX+NT]
__C IN INDIRECT QUESTIONS, whether, followed by the indicative, subjunctive, or optative, according to the principles of oratio obliqua:
__C.1 with IN[εἰ μήν θεός ἐστιν">Refs 4th c.BC+] whether he is a god, [εἰ μήν ξυμπονήσεις.. σκόπει 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Antigone” 41. ">Refs 8th c.BC+]
__C.2 with SUB[Refs 1st c.AD+]subjunctive in the direct question, τὰ ἐκπώματα οὐκ οἶδ᾽ εἰ μήν Χρυσάντᾳ τουτῳῒ δῶ whether I should give them, [εἰ μήν στρατεύηται ἐπὶ τοὺς Πέρσας 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 1.75. ">Refs 5th c.BC+]
__C.3 OPT. after past tenses, representing either of the two previous constructions in the direct question, ἤρετο εἴ τις ἐμοῦ εἴη σοφώτερος he asked whether any one was wiser than I (direct ἔστι τις σοφώτερο;), [εἰ μήν βούλοιτό οἱ τὴν θυγατέρα ἔχειν γυναῖκα 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 1.60: rarely ">Refs 5th c.BC+]aorist optative for the aorist indicative, ἠρώτων αὐτὸν εἰ μήν ἀναπλεύσειεν I asked him whether he had set sail (direct ἀνέπλευσα;), [Refs 4th c.BC+]aorist optative usually represents aorist subjunctive, τὸν θεὸν ἐπήροντο εἰ μήν παραδοῖεν Κορινθίοις τὴν πόλιν.. καὶ τιμωρίαν τινὰ πειρῷντ᾽ ἀπ᾽ αὐτῶν ποιεῖσθαι they asked whether they should deliver their city to the Corinthians, and should try.., [Refs 5th c.BC+] —in both constructions the _indicative_ or subjunctive may be retained, ψῆφον ἐβούλοντο ἐπαγαγεῖν εἰ μήν χρὴ πολεμεῖν[Refs]; ἐβουλεύοντο εἴτε κατακαύσωσιν.. εἴτε τι ἄλλο χρήσωνται whether they should burn them or should dispose of them in some other way, [Refs]; ἀνακοινοῦσθαι αὐτὸν αὑτῷ εἰ μήν δῷ ἐπιψηφίσαι τοῖς προέδροις [he said that] he consulted him whether he should give.., [Refs 4th c.BC+]
__C.4 with OPT. and ἄν when this was the form of the direct question, ἠρώτων εἰ μήν δοῖεν ἂν τούτων τὰ πιστά they asked whether they would give (direct δοιήτε ἄ;), [Refs 5th c.BC+]
__C.5 the NEG. used with εἰ μήν in indirect questions is οὐ, when οὐ would be used in the direct question, ἐνετέλλετο.. εἰ μήνρωτᾶν εἰ μήν οὔ τι ἐπαισχύνεται whether he is not ashamed, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; but if μή would be required in the direct form, it is retained in the indirect, οὐ τοῦτο ἐρωτῶ, ἀλλ᾽ εἰ μήν τοῦ μὲν δικαίου μὴ ἀξιοῖ πλέον ἔχειν μηδὲ βούλεται ὁ δίκαιος, τοῦ δὲ ἀδίκου (the direct question would be μὴ ἀξιοῖ μηδὲ βούλετα; he does not see fit nor wish, does he?) [Refs 5th c.BC+]:—in double indirect questions, εἴτε.. εἴτε..; εἰ μήν.. εἴτε..; εἴτε.. ἢ.., either οὐ or μή can be used in the second clause, ὅπως ἴδῃς εἴτ᾽ ἔνδον εἴτ᾽ οὐκ ἔνδον [εἰ μήν ἡμῖν πρέπει ἢ οὔ 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Respublica” 451d ">Refs 5th c.BC+]; εἰ μήν ἀληθὲς ἢ μή, πειράσομαι μαθεῖν[εἰ μήν παρ᾽ ἐκείνῳ διῃτᾶτο ἢ οὔ, καὶ γάμους εἰ μήν διττοὺς ὑπὲρ ταύτης εἱστίασεν ἢ μὴ.. πάντα ταῦτα εἰ μήνδέναι τοὺς οἰκέτας 4th c.BC: Isaeus Orator 8.9 ">Refs 4th c.BC+]; τοὺς νόμους καταμανθάνειν εἰ μήν καλῶς κεῖνται ἢ μή.. τοὺς λόγους εἰ μήν ὀρθῶς ὑμᾶς διδάσκουσιν ἢ οὔ [Refs 5th c.BC+]

_{LSJ Scripture Refs: Rev.11.5 ☩ LXX.Ps.94.11* ☩ Mark.8.12}